Ren -- Did you actually read the article? What we are getting here is third-hand allegations and hearsay from a KGB official. Do we have any actual evidence tying Kennedy to these allegations? Letters or phone calls from Kennedy? Even a witness who is alleging that he heard Kennedy do any of the things that we are led to believe that he did? I realize that if we cannot trust the Soviet-era KGB we cannot trust anyone, but goodness, I think you are letting your ideological blinkers blind you to the difference between shoddy use of historical evidence and good use of historical evidence.
3 comments:
Ren --
Did you actually read the article? What we are getting here is third-hand allegations and hearsay from a KGB official. Do we have any actual evidence tying Kennedy to these allegations? Letters or phone calls from Kennedy? Even a witness who is alleging that he heard Kennedy do any of the things that we are led to believe that he did? I realize that if we cannot trust the Soviet-era KGB we cannot trust anyone, but goodness, I think you are letting your ideological blinkers blind you to the difference between shoddy use of historical evidence and good use of historical evidence.
dcat
i heard that, sss.
Post a Comment