This article, and th "sadly true" comment that passes for standard Big Tent insight is, to say the least, bullshit. Stewart was right when he was on CNN, not that you'd know as much from the National Review article. Of course Stewart is smarter than most of those guys too, so I'm not surprised. The problem with the humorless right is thay hate it when they are the targets. Tough. Stewart is funny. His show is hilarious. That he took on the party in power more often than Kerry might just show that the party in power is incredibly mockable. Too bad the National review and Tom do not get it.
2 comments:
This article, and th "sadly true" comment that passes for standard Big Tent insight is, to say the least, bullshit. Stewart was right when he was on CNN, not that you'd know as much from the National Review article. Of course Stewart is smarter than most of those guys too, so I'm not surprised. The problem with the humorless right is thay hate it when they are the targets. Tough. Stewart is funny. His show is hilarious. That he took on the party in power more often than Kerry might just show that the party in power is incredibly mockable. Too bad the National review and Tom do not get it.
In reply to the ad hominem rant: I'll let our readers look at the article and the above reply and decide who gets it.
If you don't appreciate the insights we provide, please feel free not to read us.
Post a Comment