Monday, May 17, 2004

Our Chosen Profession: Historians vs. George W. Bush

Historians vs. George W. Bush
The title of this article should have been, "Historians, on Balance, Remarkably Stupid."

5 comments:

dcat said...

Wait a second, I do not see a single indication here that historians (or the article) are "stupid." What I see is that they are liberal and they oppose Bush. There is nothing unreasonable, and there is certainly nothing stupid about this.

greg said...

The History News Network and the professor who conducted this "unscientific" poll should be ashamed of themselves for putting such drivel on their website. It's not their job to poll and it's not their job to rate presidents; their job is to be unbiased and objective in researching and reporting past events.

dcat said...

It is not historians' job to rate presidents? (?!?) It is not historians' job to conduct polls? Um, ok. Dumbest. Comment. Ever.
dc

Anonymous said...



HI Stephen

After a good read on blogs like this I like to leave little tips on goal setting. You know, the things you used to dream of when you were young, or even now.

A lot of research has shown that only those who set goals are likely to achieve their dreams.

When is the last time you really sat down and wrote a few short term and long term goals down?

What? It's been that long!

A new year is coming. You could do the same things you did this year and achieve the same results you did with your life dreams last year…

…or you could visit Effective Goal Setting and read all the FREE information on setting goals and getting what you want out of life

OR

you could just piddle on through life hoping for the best, like most people do.

Which will it be?

You really can have a lot more of everything than you do now. All you gotta do is know what you want and have a plan.

Have a GREAT New Year!

line of credit said...

A